Top Performing Decklists
| Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeskai Oculus | darth_vaner | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 64 #12769053 |
| Jeskai Oculus | crazymorango | 8-2 | 1st in MTGO Standard Challenge 32 #12769907 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Azorius Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Temur Otters | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Sultai Dragons | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Jeskai Control | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 14, 2025 |
| Izzet Spellslingers | darthkid | 7-2 | None |
| Dimir Midrange | strongmind | 7-2 | None |
| Jeskai Oculus | phoenix_flame | 7-2 | None |
Performance Stats (Last 14 Days)
Win Rate Impact
Top Table Win Rate
Meta Trend
Sample Size
Tournament Results
Average Copies
Archetypes Using This Card:
5 Color Legends , Azorius Auras , Azorius Control , Azorius Flash , Azorius Glyph , Azorius Soldiers , Azorius Synthesizer , Azorius Tempo , Azorius Tokens Control , Bant Auras
Meta Performance Analysis
Disdainful Stroke ranks #153 out of approximately 406 cards in raw efficiency (top 38%).
Game Impact Factor
Color Differential
Blue average: 72.0%
Performance compared to other Blue cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Disdainful Stroke is a decent card with average performance in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Win Rate Timeline
Card Efficiency Analysis
Raw Efficiency (Win Rate/Mana)
Relative Efficiency
Performance Efficiency: 20.12 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 2 mana, the average win rate in the format is 74.7%. Disdainful Stroke has a win rate of 75.3%, making it 0.9% better than other 2-mana cards.
Top Performing Partners
| Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
|---|
Card Synergy Analysis
Cards that perform better with Disdainful Stroke than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
| Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marang River Regent | Creature — Dragon | 6 | 5 | 92.9% | 75.7% | +17.2% |
| Temporary Lockdown | Enchantment | 3 | 9 | 87.5% | 73.9% | +13.6% |
| Sunfall | Sorcery | 5 | 7 | 85.7% | 74.5% | +11.3% |
| Thundertrap Trainer | Creature — Otter Wizard | 2 | 5 | 87.5% | 76.8% | +10.7% |
| No More Lies | Instant | 2 | 6 | 83.3% | 73.2% | +10.1% |
| Obstinate Baloth | Creature — Beast | 4 | 12 | 84.8% | 75.5% | +9.4% |
| This Town Ain't Big Enough | Instant | 5 | 11 | 84.0% | 75.0% | +9.0% |
| Witchstalker Frenzy | Instant | 4 | 12 | 83.8% | 74.9% | +8.9% |
| Stock Up | Sorcery | 3 | 24 | 83.0% | 75.6% | +7.4% |
| Three Steps Ahead | Instant | 1 | 6 | 82.6% | 75.4% | +7.2% |
Top Archetypes
| Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimir Midrange | 464 | 22.4% | 45.4% |
| Jeskai Convoke | 203 | 36.5% | 48.2% |
| Temur Otters | 73 | 21.7% | 40.5% |
| Esper Pixie | 67 | 4.3% | 57.1% |
| Azorius Tempo | 64 | 16.1% | 39.9% |
Statistics Explanation
| Statistic | Description | Formula |
|---|---|---|
| Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
| Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
| Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
| Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
| Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
| Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
| Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
| Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
| Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
| Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
| Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.